My husband's ex has a cycle, which he explained to me when we were dating and I have seen in full in the four years we have been married. She will be thoroughly cooperative for a while--letting him have extra time, etc. etc. Even friendly to the point of coming to our house to seek advice from my husband. THEN she completely flip-flops and we end up in court--or trying to avoid court.
Well, my husband is not much into the details of parenting plans, etc. And I will admit that he is willing to push various issues. Most the time he can read his ex pretty well, so he knows how far to push. (Of course when she flips to the dark side of her cycle, there is nothing anyone can do, really.) Anyway, there have been occasions when he has been "in contempt."
In recent pondering, I realized that BM never used any of the instances that my husband was actually and truly in contempt when she filed papers. She relied completely on falsehoods--not even mixing in the true with the false. I just think it is odd. We know she would get nowhere with just the little things my husband is actually in contempt over, but if she's going to lie anyway, why not include all the other stuff??
The ignorance of that woman is mind-numbing to me.... Even more mind-numbing is that she still gets away with whatever she wants--in and out of the courtroom.