Mom-Of-Two, I do aplologize. Your names are very similar, so I'm sure you can see why one would make that mistake. I'm sure it's not the first, or the last time that's going to happen.
While my tone I would reserve for momfortwo, I do stand by the overall facts of my post - that subsequent children ARE grounds for a modification, that a child support order need not be in place for the subsequent children in order for them to apply to such modification, and that the calculations are based on an income share. Also that Minnesota does consider the persons obligation to their other children in the calculation of child support.
Once again, I apologize for confusing you with momfortwo. However, I disagree that my posts have "relegated this site to being useless". The facts of my post are still true.