I understand that there are circumstances that make it necessary to move and change the child's school. I grew up an Air Force brat, and changed schools 4 times before high school, so I also know that changing schools can be rough on kids. In my opinion, you should try to avoid it unless it's necessary.
My daughter is in a program for talented and gifted children, and moving her would mean that she would be taken out of the program. That is what I want to stop from happening. She's doing very well in school.
Overall there are some problems, but we just went to court a month ago, and the GAL didn't feel that the problems were severe enough "at this point" to warrant a custody change. The judge gave my ex a slap on the wrist, read her the riot act, and told her not to do the things she had been doing anymore.
I realized in court how difficult it is to get anyone to see what's really going on. They make it a "he said - she said" situation because no one wants to take the time or make the effort to figure out who's lying and who's telling the truth. I realized that, if I have any hope of things changing in the future, I will have to go through the courts when there is a problem, so that the judge sees it for himself, and so that there is documentation other than my word. For me, that means filing a show cause order when she violates the agreement, instead of notating it in my journal (that no one gave a _____ about, or was interested in seeing). In fact, my GAL and the home study person BOTH said that "I've seen guys come in with binders of information, indexed and tabbed...." (which is what a lot of things I have read TELL you to do) and then state that, in their opinion, a person who would do something like that is a control freak.
It's frustrating, and I'm frustrated, because I feel like my kids are suffering and there's nothing I can do because the court system is in control. I feel like no one wants to know what's really going on. In court, the GAL said that he spent more time on our case than he's spent on most... he met with my ex wife and I twice each, for about 1 1/2 hours, in his office. It's appaling to me to think that someone who is going to make that kind of assessment routinely does so having spent 3 hours or less with the people affected. What can you really determine in three hours?
He then went on to say that he was "very concerned" with some of the issues that I had brought to his attention, but that the kids appear to be doing ok based on his interviews with them and their grades in school. Of course, it was the end of their summer break, so he was looking at their school performance over the previous year... he didn't account for the fact that my youngest child was repeating kindergarten last year, or that my oldest was in therapy for depression and a possible eating disorder. Not to mention the fact that children who are being alienated from a parent aren't going to open up to someone that they've spoken with twice for a few minutes at a time.... what did he think they were going to tell him, other than everything was "fine"?
Ok... sorry for the rant. I'm just really frustrated that we went through all the stuff for court - which dragged on for nine months, only to end up right where I started.